System decommissioning, migration, and manager responsibilities – summary of the June Digital Implementers group June 22, 2015 No Comments
As usual, a diverse group attended from across government. There was a lively discussion around the various implementation challenges the organisations are facing, as well as discussion of data migration and decommissioning challenges, and management accountabilities for information. Read the rest of this entry »
Recently, State Records staff attended a very informative session hosted by the NSW Privacy Commissioner, Dr Elizabeth Coombs. This “Privacy Matters” event was held to mark Privacy Awareness Week, which is an initiative supported by the Asia Pacific Privacy Awareness forum.
State Records had a stand at the forum in conjunction with staff from NSW Finance and Services. In preparation for the event, and in the spirit of privacy awareness week, we have been thinking about how information and records management can improve privacy management for public sector organisations.
As you all know, State Records NSW is responsible for the State Records Act 1998, which contains obligations for the management of records and information across the NSW public sector. Achieving appropriate protection and accountability when managing private information is an important objective underlying our guidance and standards. Read the rest of this entry »
Each year State Records distributes a newsletter to all Chief Executives in the NSW public sector.
This year’s newsletter highlights some of the major initiatives of the last year across State Records, including the new Standard on Records Management, the launch of business as usual operations for the Digital State Archive, and enhancements to the OpenGov and Data.NSW platforms.
The newsletter is intended to start conversations between chief executives, management, business, ICT and records and information staff about the strategic management of organisational business information.
The newsletter is available here on the State Records website. A downloadable PDF version of the newsletter is also available below:
Future Proof newsletter, 2015 (PDF, 65KB)
Photo: Steve Johnson (CC BY-SA 2.0)
Last week we had our regular digital implementers group meeting. This session’s topic was digital disposal. In advance of the meeting, we conducted a mini-survey of the group to get a sense of their progress and capacity was in this area. The results of this were interesting because, while it was a limited sample, there is a diverse group of organisations represented on the group. We previously conducted a broader survey on digital disposal a few years ago, so it was interesting to see how those responses measured up to today. As always, the group was very interactive, and we had two people presenting case studies.
Recent digital advice May 1, 2015 No Comments
State Records is constantly talking to government organisations about a fascinating range of projects. These range broadly from questions about data migration to ongoing engagements about digital business transformation. Some of the issues we have covered recently include:
Email in the cloud. We have talked to a number of organisations trying to determine how to appropriately manage email when a cloud transition occurred. This change of the technology platform represents a challenge, as existing processes and system integrations need substantial modification. However, it also represents an opportunity because the major change was an opportunity to reframe records management requirements and introduce them seamlessly as part of the system transition. Read the rest of this entry »
The Standard on Records Management was issued at the beginning of March. We’ve already started to hear back about the work being done to implement the standard.
We are particularly interested to hear how people have used the standard to support the implementation or assessment of digital systems and the transformation of digital processes. One of the major changes we made with the new Standard on Records Management was to emphasize a range of responsibilities so that the obligations on executives and business unit managers were more explicitly stated. Simultaneously, we shifted some of the more detailed requirements into guidance, as we felt that the digital environments in which they were implemented were extremely varied and changing rapidly. Detailed advice needs to be flexible and able to be updated outside of the standard review cycle.
We have been pleased by the number of public offices who have contacted us to tell us about their implementation progress. We would welcome contact from organisations willing to develop case studies which can be shared for the benefit of the sector, or those who just want to let us know about their progress so far. Please use the contact form below to get in touch!
Enterprise Search – part 2 April 20, 2015 1 Comment
Our recent post about our latest Digital Implementers Group workshop, in which we discussed Enterprise Search technologies, has generated a fair bit of discussion. I thought it might be a good opportunity to delve into this a bit more, as well as discuss the role of the digital implementers group.
The Digital Implementers Group
The Digital Implementers Group is made up of diverse group of public sector information and records specialists who get together every six weeks or so to discuss implementation challenges in their information and records management systems. It used to be called the EDRMS implementers group but the group agreed last year that they do much more than implement EDRMS and so we renamed the group. The topics which the group discuss are driven by the group: things like the organisational challenges they are facing, the technologies they are considering, the risks which are emerging.
The blog posts we put up about the group (and our blog posts in general) are not “Official State Records guidance”, although we like to think they contain a lot of useful information. What they do is try to provide a summary of what the group (which contains a reasonably representative cross-section of the NSW Public Sector) is currently thinking in relation to a particular issue. Not all those who might want to can attend our workshops, so the blog is a good chance to share what went on with the sector.
Enterprise Search technologies
For our purposes, we have defined enterprise search as technologies which are able to index content across a diverse set of information repositories within an organisation, and present search results to these repositories in a single interface. This covers quite a broad range of tools, including some which are now being integrated with popular EDRMS / ECM solutions.
We have had quite a few questions come through about the workshop. Some people questioned how we had come to these conclusions about what the opportunity for enterprise search was or was not. Someone even wrote a whole article “debunking” some of the things in the blog post. This is an important discussion topic to continue. Here are some further observations from the workshop and other recent agency discussions: Read the rest of this entry »
New podcasts on Future Proof April 2, 2015 No Comments
On the 17th of March we had our Records Managers Forum. State Records NSW uses the forum to share information about key initiatives with our public offices. It is also a place for lively discussion with colleagues from across the government sector. As usual, we have published the podcasts so that those who could not make it on the day and the wider sector can keep up to date.
This time the forum included presentations from the Office of Finance and Services, and State Records NSW. The presentations covered the latest news from State Records, including the Digital Archives and the new Standard on Records Management, as well as the latest on the NSW Government ICT Strategy and the Information Management framework.
Check out http://futureproof.records.nsw.gov.au/the-future-proof-podcast-series/#episode43 to hear these latest podcasts and view the presentations.
Enterprise search – the answer to all our problems or technology that most users neither need nor want? March 25, 2015 5 Comments
Enterprise search technologies have been widely touted as the answer to the massive quantities of information being created and kept in many organisations today. Employees won’t need to know where particular information is kept – they will be able to search for the information across network drives, email systems, traditional document and records management systems and other repositories.
Some think that the implementation of enterprise search will boost the productivity of employees and thereby increase an organisation’s profits. In fact, we referred to a survey that found that organisations could save millions of dollars by improving the ability of users to find relevant information in our last post.
Yesterday’s meeting of State Records’ Digital Implementers Group focussed on enterprise search technologies. We were keen to hear about the experiences of NSW public sector organisations in implementing these technologies, and the uses they are being put to. The current situation within the organisations represented at the meeting was not what we expected, but very interesting none the less! Read the rest of this entry »
A survey by Brisbane-based information management specialists Glentworth has revealed that organisations across the private and public sectors are losing millions of dollars in productivity each year as staff waste time finding information. Glentworth used the minimum award wage of $16.87 per hour, combined with the average time it took survey respondents to find information at work (44.36 minutes), to determine that organisations could save millions of dollars by improving the ability of users to find relevant information.
Carefully structured metadata in combination with good system search functionality can help users to find and use business information quickly and easily when they need to. Using defined categories or elements (e.g. ‘Creator’, ‘Title’, ‘Date Created’ etc.), and then assigning particular terms within these, facilitates specific search queries that can target relevant categories rather than needing to search across all metadata.
Metadata can also connect related records so that a consolidated picture of a business process, subject or matter is provided. Read the rest of this entry »